jump to navigation

Marathon & Citrix with Exchange 2007 October 15, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

Benchmark tests have proven that Exchange on XenServer combined with Marathon Everrun VM is the best virtualization platform. Learn more on November 11th at 11:30 EDT, subscribe here.

Virtualization Industry News October 15, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment
  • Altor Networks has announced what it describes as the first “purpose built” virtual firewall, Altor VF, for securing network traffic between virtual machines (VMs) (more)
  • VKernel Ships Capacity Analyzer 2.0 Performance Assurance Solution (more)
  • Vizioncore vRanger Pro Reduces Backup Costs and Improves Effectiveness (study)
  • StorMagic SM Series certified on VMware ESX 3.5 and 3i (more)
  • Isilon announces certification on ESX 3.5 (more)
  • SteelEye Technology Debuts Industry’s First Multi-Site Cluster Solution for Linux (more)
  • Citrix partners with rPath
  • IsilonIQ certified on XenServer (more)
  • VMware expands SVVP certified for Microsoft (more)
  • Citrix releases preview of EdgeSight for XenApp 5 on w2K8 (more)

Citrix goes all the way for OVF … project Kensho for XenServer & Hyper-V October 15, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Citrix Drives Adoption of Virtual Appliance Portability Standard for Enterprises and Clouds. Project Kensho is now publicly available, this project offers you portability of VMs based on the OVF standard.

The project consists out of 2 components: the OVF tool (for importing and exporting in OVF format) and a CIM interface for interaction with the XenServer.

The requirements for using Kensho on XenServer: a PC with XP or W2K3, Citrix XenServer 4.1. It also works with Microsoft 2WK8 with the Hyper-V role. As you will be extraing and importing OVF files, you need a share to store them.

Gartners’ Symposium ITxpo : Virtualization a strategic strategy for 2009 October 15, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

Each year Gartner releases a list of 10 technologies that will do ‘very well’ in the next year. On the list for 2008, Virtualization was in the fifth spot, for 2009 this is on number 1. On number 2: Cloud Computing and on number 3: Computing Fabrics.

In general ‘computing fabrics’ is a server technology in which you buy the physical resources you need and put them dynamically together to create resource pools

GreenIT which came in the 2008-list on number 1, has been moved to place number 10 in the 2009 list.

Full list.

Datacore & XenServer 5 October 15, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Datacore has released a document confirming that both SANmelody and SANsymphony now can be configured to present iSCSI or Fiber Channel virtual volumes to XenServer 5.

Full technical details can be found here.

Microsoft MDOP – quantifying the value … October 13, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, desktop virtualization.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

During the last getVIRTUAL show in Antwerp last Friday, Arlinda Alves (MSFT) pointed out that both APP-V and MED-V will be part of the MDOP package. To be very honest, after I will I got a little bit confused on differentiating APP-V and MED-V. Above all, it also made me wonder what the financial impact would be of the MDOP-package once it is fully functional (probably after the next major event in Barcelona).

Thanks to Gartner all the confusion washed away and i know have a clear overview of the financial aspects. More here.

Cloud Computing – Cloud Economics October 13, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Cloud Computing.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

A new discussion is going on within the Google Cloud Computing Group and it is all about USD an EURs. Following this discussion, citrite Chris Fleck has posted his vision on the financial aspects of cloud systems and he comes to a number of conclusions:

  • … On the other hand the economics do point out a major cloud advantage when it comes to short term or variable workloads …
  • …. Given the intrinsic cost savings possible as portrayed in this example, there is little doubt that CSP’s will fill the gaps and the industry will move to Premise Plus Cloud solutions. 

Read more in part 1 and 2

Virtualization Industry News and News from StorageWorld October 13, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
  • Scalent Systems announces provisioning of RHEL on bare metal and Xen
  • Compellent to Offer Automated Business Continuity with Live Volume (more)
  • Cisco teams up with QLogic to offer end-to-end virtualization (more)
  • Clavister releases secure OS CorePlus 9.10 with virtualization (more)
  • SourceForge released HostedApps (more)
  • FalconStore supports Microsoft W2K8 Server Failover Clustering & hyper-V (more)
  • LSI Unveils Powerful Next-Generation Software for Centralized Storage Management (more)
  • Mellanox ConnectX 10GigE Mezzanine Adapter for IBM BladeCenter Is Blade.org Compliant (more)
  • FCIA to Demonstrate 8GFC and Fibre Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE) At Storage Networking World (more)
  • Xiotech Expands Family of Application-Driven Storage Management (more)
  • InMage Systems Announces New Version of Flagship DR-Scout Disaster Recovery Software (more)
  • EMC Introduces its First Switch for Fibre Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE) (more)
  • EMC Announces Support for SNIA SMI-S V1.3 Across EMC Symmetrix and EMC Clariion Storage Platforms (more)

VMware VDC-OS & 2009 Roadmap – Podcast October 12, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment

The guys & girls over at VMTN talked about the concepts of the virtual datacenter OS with VMware’s own Leena Joshi, and they covered some of the 2009 roadmap material which was announced during VMworld 2008.

Listen here.

Virtualization Industry News October 12, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment
  • Alternative Technology Launches Suite of Virtualization Protections Solutions with Double-Take Software
  • AutoVirt to Revolutionize Data Migration for Windows in the Mid-Market

Cloud Computing … what to cloud and what not to cloud and with whom? … Cloud Computing Incidents Database October 12, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Cloud Computing.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Both VMware, Citrix and Microsoft have announced their cloud-initiatives. The one is a little bit ahead in development then the other, but in general none of the three have a cloud-initiative that is “ready to manufacture”.

In the case that the cloud is “ready-to-manufacture”, the next step is analyzing which application can be moved into the cloud and who will be your cloud-provider. When looking at the type of applications you will be “clouding”, it is important to verify the “value” of the application to the business.

First of all you are moving an application (which requires data) to the internet / cloud. So there are possible security risks. The Cloud Computing Incidents Database (CCID) tracks all events that impact cloud computing providers. Do not forget that the CCID is an open-community (only founded earlier this year.), so it relies on people logging the events, as you can espect major cloud-providers are not logging their events.

If you look at the stats for Q3/08 you get 3 critical events, 3 high severity events and 3 others, the incidents range from disaster recovery, design faults, … into session hijacking, user impersonation, … Even one resulted in all data being lost due to closure of the service (The Linkup).

It must be said, whatever cloud initiative you will be implementing keep a very close eye on the financial stability of your provider, the relationship with your provider and the security your provider is offering you.

A vendor that is specializing in offering cloud solutions to cloud providers must be aware of the security risks and react accordingly in order to prevent security breaches which might result in data theft, resulting in lost profitability of the customer. 

Looking at the earlier mentioned vendors, we see that VMware is moving with small steps ahead when it comes to providing security solutions for their cloud initiative and it must be said that their solution will be probably the latest on the market.

Addition 13.10.2008 – If the information on the web is correct, it seems to be that VMware will indeed takeover BlueLane Technologies, a specialist in protecting both physical and virtual servers. Yet it gets integrated on the server itself and is in that way not the security solution when it comes to protecting the data center or the cloud center.

Microsoft has already a number of security solutions onboard, but do their security features meet the grade? We will have to wait for the next big event from Microsoft, probably more will be announced then.

Citrix is probably in this field, the one that is leading the pack. Their Netscaler can be equipped with layer 7 application firewalling, the access to the cloud can be encrypted with SSL-VPN solutions and their end-to-end virtualization solution can be integrated with the market leaders on 2-factor-authentication such as Vasco.

Another question that comes to mind is the type of cloud provider. Do endusers need to go ahead with big cloud providers such as Amazon.com, Google, Flexiscale, …. or can they rely on their value added reseller. Seen the fact that VAR has been implementing the IT infrastructure for the enduser and supporting its infrastructure, he is probably the best positioned to offer cloud services. Afterall it is just moving the infrastructure to another virtual location (sort of speak).

On the other hand the value added reseller might not have structure to setup big clouds. This might lead to clouds being set up by different value added resellers across the world, resulting in a gigantic cloud with follow-the-sun support.

One thing is for sure, the cloud computing initiative has just been founded, vendors are still working on their final offerings, the market is preparing itself, VARs & integrators need to prepare business cases, … we are not there yet ! However, we might be there in a very short time ! Prepare !

CloudCamp Brussels – October 30th October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment

CloudCamp is an unconference where early adapters of Cloud Computing technologies exchange ideas. With the rapid change occurring in the industry, we need a place we can meet to share our experiences, challenges and solutions. At CloudCamp, you are encouraged to share your thoughts in several open discussions, as we strive for the advancement of Cloud Computing. End users, IT professionals and vendors are all encouraged CloudCamp is an unconference where early adapters of Cloud Computing technologies exchange ideas. With the rapid change occurring in the industry, we need a place we can meet to share our experiences, challenges and solutions. At CloudCamp, you are encouraged to share your thoughts in several open discussions, as we strive for the advancement of Cloud Computing. End users, IT professionals and vendors are all encouraged to participate.

the event takes place on October 30th from 16:00 till 20:00 in Brussels.  Subscribe here

Virtualization Industry News October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment
  • Evergrid rebrands to Liberato and releases Load Manager 2.0
  • Christian Hagen becomes VP Sales for America & EMEA at Datacore
  • Symantec unveils Veritas Cluster Server One (VCS One)
  • Storage company Nexsan releases Assureon 6 for Storage-as-a-service providers
  • VMware will probably buy Blue Lane
  • Amazon will offer Windows desktop on its EC2

Citrix XenApp 5.0 – Techtalk October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization.
Tags:
add a comment

For those looking for a clear overview on what is new in XenApp 5.0, this post might come in handy.

Focussing on comparitive features, application streaming, web interface, clients, secure gateway …

Dan Kusnetzky on the value of virtualization for the economy October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Data Center Management, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
add a comment

Dan Kusnetzky (President & Principal Analyst) of analyst company Kusnetsky Group posted an article on how virtualization can help in a slowing economy to maintain profitability, …

Dan talks about 6 virtualization technologies that will help reduce costs, increase profitability

  • Access virtualization
  • Application Virtualization
  • Processing Virtualization
  • Network Virtualization
  • Storage Virtualization
  • Management and security software for virtualized environments

Memory overcommit … October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

There has been a lot written about ‘memory overcommit’ and now that Microsoft stands directly against VMware the debat is open again.

In general overcommit gives the ability to give a VM more memory than there physically is. One vendor is very clear about this at present, Citrix clearly gives the signal no overcommit. Simon Crosby has even a standard response to overcommiting memory.

“If you buy a ticket for flying from Brussels to New York, you intend to fly, there is a clear reason why you purchase a ticket. Airline companies however are famous for overbooking flights. You arrive (of course way to late at the airport, due to a meeting that took more time than foreseen), and you get the message, sorry you will have to take the next flight there are no seats left. As compensation we will over you diner here in the Airport.

Overcommiting memory in a data center has the same effect, VMs believe they have 128GB RAM each, altough there is only 64GB physical RAM to be divided over the different VMs. What happens when a VM really needs the 128GB of RAM he thinks he has, but has not? A major failur will occur and this will result in motioning VMs to other machines, loss of productivity, reduced profitability of the company, …

Altough you get a diner offered by the airline in compensation when a flight is overbooked, what is the compensation for the VM that gets into trouble due to overcommitting, what is the compensation for the business losing money as its VMs are not running ?

Now that Microsoft and VMware get into a personal competition it is very interesting to see what both have to say on overcommitting memory.

VMware is clear about it, they are the only one at present to offer this feature. But there is a clear remark on overcommitting by VMware. there need to be three ingredients (as Alberto Farronato calls it) active and well-configured: transparent memory paging, balloon driver, optimized algorithms in the hypervisor kernel.

Microsoft has always said they would not include overcommit in Hyper-V (to our knowledge it is not included in the current verison). Yet Alberto Farronato (VMW) aims at Microsoft, he writes in his post, … Bob Muglia, Microsoft VP, confirmed the usefulness of memory overcommit, …, he refers to an interview between Bob Muglia and Steven Bink during the Windows server 2008 launch in LA. In the article by Steven Bink, Mr. Muglia says the following:

We talked about Vmware ESX and its features like shared memory between VMs, “we definitely need to put that in our product” later he said it will be in the next release. Like hot add memory, disk and nic’s will be and Live migration of course, which didn’t make it in this release.

To my knowledge there is a great difference between shared memory and memory overcommit. This does not mean that Microsoft will be integration ‘memory overcommit’. Overcommitting is something different than sharing.

It must be said, VMware is doing its best to proof that overcommitting is a good think, they performed an online research amongst 110 VMware customers. Apparently 57% is using overcommit, that leaves 43% that is not using overcommit. Of those 57% overcommitting, there are 11% only using it within development-environments. So from the 110 respondents that means that 55 companies are not using overcommitt … that is 50%.

Overcommitting is for sure a hot topic, with clearly a team in favour and a team against. Perhaps this is the moment that we have to start looking at memory-virtualization and offering memory cross-platform to VMs.

Anyhow, if you buy a planeticket to go on honeymoon, you hope that the flight is not overbooked. Otherwise, you will be like friends of mine, postponing their honeymoon for 2 days. Not a happy tought.

 

 

 

 

Citrix Xenserver with Netapp storage – considerations October 10, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Data Center Management, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

As you might know Citrix XenCenter gives you the ability to manage your Netapp storage boxes through a ONTAP connector.  On the Citrix site there is an interesting article on the integration, the sorts of installs supported, … read the report.

VMware VDI – Storage considerations October 9, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.
Tags:
add a comment

VMware released its latest guide regarding storage considerations when it comes to VMware VDIs, unfortunately the report is not that in-depth and the conclusions are ratter vague:

1.  Design choices for a production VMware VDI implementation should be based on an understanding of the disk needs of the virtual machines. Windows XP or Vista clients have radically different needs from virtual machines that provide server functions: The disk I/O for clients is more than 90% read and is rather low (7 MBtyes/sec or 112 IOPS per 20 virtual machines). In addition, very little disk space is needed beyond the operating system and application installations because all end-user data should be stored in existing network-based centralized storage, on file servers or on NAS devices.

2. Once the disk size, throughput, and IOPS needs of a given VMware VDI deployment are understood, the choices of storage protocol, array type, disk types, and RAID types follow directly. Thin provisioning, data deduplication, and cloning can drastically lower the on-disk needs in terms of disk space required.

3. The most important consideration in storage decisions may not necessarily be technical but often financial. Can existing datacenter resources be reused? What is the value proposition and return on investment of acquiring an entirely new storage environment?

Read the short report.

Storage Virtualization: 5 questions you should ask yourself October 9, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Storage Virtualization & Storage.
add a comment

Storage virtualization is kicking off, unfortuantely the title “storage virtualization” covers different types of solutions. Also the issues you are trying to solve have a big impace on the type of the solution. The editors of CIO.com have taken the time to set up a list of 5 simple questions, that will guide you thru the decission process.

Questions covered:

  1. What problem are you trying to solve
  2. Do you want host-, network- or array-based virtualization
  3. How much complexity can you handle
  4. What is the budget
  5. Do you have an exit strategy
For sure these are interesting questions and the answers are even more interesting, read the report here.

I/O Virtualization – a product comparison October 9, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in I/O Virtualization.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

There are several approaches, from VirtualConnect’s abstraction of Mac addresses to 3Leaf and Xsigo’s virtualization of physical transports to NextIO’s approach, which virtualizes PCI Express. More here.

TOPIC: Security in virtualized data centers … reports October 9, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Data Center Management.
Tags:
add a comment

Server virtualization has entered over the last year the data center, normally new technologies are well-tested before they enter production data centers. Yet server virtualization initially has not been set to the test. Currently more and more signs show that security might be weak point within the solutions.

Both Embotics and Market & Research have released whitepapers and reports on the subject. One thing is for sure the security risks with physical devices are exactly the same for virtualized devices and perhaps the risks are bigger as the virtualization layer is a new OS, which equals a new attack. When running multiple hosts on the same phyiscal server, you can even have the risk of intrahost-attacks. …

The full Embotics report

Recently the ‘Government Computer News’ reports on a survey released by nCircle Inc that security is a doubtfull matter for more than half of the respondents. In that survey, 47 percent (on 200 respondents) said they didn’t think the security methodologies around current virtualization programs were sound at all. Another seven percent of respondents ranked virtualization security in the “maybe/ depends” category.

George Pradel (Director of Strategic Alliances) of Vizioncore on Virtualization Backup, DR, Server Consolidation, and Performance Monitoring October 9, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Data Center Management.
Tags:
add a comment

In this podcast Doug Brown and George Pradel discuss Vizioncore’s virtualization backup, disaster recovery, server consolidation, and performance monitoring solutions for VMware environments. Doug and George will also discuss how Vizioncore’s solutions work, what it takes to deploy / maintain them, and what problems they solve.

listen to Podcast here

TOPIC: Standard Operating Procedures for Virtualization Management (SOPs) October 7, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Data Center Management.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

As virtualization provides a new dimension to IT, it also shows a new dimension when it comes to management and maintenance. Virtualization will lower the TCO, increase the ROI, offer the capacity to correctly react to the changing needs of the business, … all nice aspects … but … It is not unthinkable that all these nice benefits go down the drain when your environment is not well prepared. When talking about ‘the environment’ we refer to both the physical infrastructure and software but also to those maintaining the infrastructure.

In order to eliminate the “risks” involved when it comes to maintance & management, setting up ‘Standard Operating Procedures’ are a good start, as long as those that need to execute thse SOPs are properly educated.

What is a SOP ? According to Wikipedia a SOP is a set of instructions (with the force of a directive) covering features of operations that lend themselves to a definite or standardized procedure without loss of effectiveness.

So in plain English it comes to a well structured worflow that consists out of triggers, prerequisites, actors, actions, output, tools and management, that will guide those that need to execute the SOP through a management task without being ‘to lawfully’. The goal is setting up SOPs that click together without be to obligatory.

A practical example of a set of SOPs that flow into a process:

A new employee has been attracted by the company, this involves a number of IT tasks that need to be executed before that employee can start working.  

SOP1 – creating new user within domain
SOP2 – creating mailbox for new user
SOP3 – creating phone extension for new user
SOP4 – setting applicaiton permissions for new user

So all these SOPs flow into a complete process (f.e. Setting up new employees within the IT Department), it is not only the goal to roll out high quality easy to follow SOPs but they can even be combined into (for example) a Six Sigma project that provides you with the capacity to look for (financial) improvements.

Before a SOP gets on the way, there has to be a trigger that crosses a treshold. Within a management context of a virtualized data center, this comes to planned or unplanned maintenance or a project request. What ever type of trigger occurs, it is important that these triggers are recorded in a ticketing system. In general there are three triggers:

  • Planned maintenance: upgrades, fixes, rollouts, rollbacks, implementations, … in general these planned triggers occur after the approval of a customer, a business unit or a manager. There is clearly a formal approval necessary before you can start with this planned maintenance.
  • Unplanned maintenance: an event that has not been planned (for example hardware failure, …) that requires an immediate action from the operations team. Within this case no formal approval of a customer, business unit or manager.
  • Project Request: this is probably the widest of the three triggers, this ranges from setting up a new VM over creating a new vDisk, provisioning of a new server, … In most cases the Project Requests can be planned well in advance and are based on a formal approval of the customer, business unit or manager

Now that the trigges have been defined, it is important to indicate which prerequisites need to be met before the SOP gets to work. These prerequisites are often documents or approvals from the involved party, except for the unplanned maintenance triggers. The prerequisites should also include scheduling (if possible).

Once the prerequisites have been met, it is important to indicate those that need to execute the SOP. This can be a system administrator, an IT manager, a helpdesk coordinator, IT Ops, … make sure that you assign job roles to these actors instead of specific names.

The next step are the action steps, these steps should be prescriptive, actionable and concise, furthermore those tools that need to be used should be documented. It does not help to work out a book of actions, you should have confidence in those that take the actions as you have educated them on the actions.

  • Bad example: Login to management console X, click on the server with the issue, right-click, …
  • Good example: Login to management console, put host into maintenance mode, verify no VMs running, apply patch, …
If you document your actions to extensive this will generate boredom with the actors, which will result in increased downtime, which will result in decreased profitability for the business.
The actions that have been taken should result in an expected output. This output needs to be known when you setup a SOP. If you have a SOP for patch management, the output should be at least that the latest patch has been applied. Make sure you define the output as a checklist. This checklist should include the following:
  • The goal of the SOP has been met (for example applying a patch)
  • Ticket status within the ticketing system
  • A formal notification
The last part of the SOP should be the management part. Make sure they are generally available and updated on a regular base (document history !). Make sure you have an escalation procedure in place when a SOP goes wrong (perhaps this can also be set in a SOP). Metrics are also interesting, specifically for general management and SOPs can even be used when training new hires.

One aspect till now has not been covered: testing. Make sure you test these SOPs before you rmove them from a draft version into a final version. If testing shows errors, issues, … change the SOP before  you move them to the final stage of implementing the SOP. When implementing these SOPs make sure that all involved parties have received the necessary training. If you have the time (you should make the time !), do a testrun with the SOP.

Also it is very smart to implement a prioritization for the SOPs, some SOPs solve bigger issues that other. For example setting up a new VM should have a lower priority than solving a security SOP on a running VM.

Do all SOPs need to be documented, as long as there is no technological solution for this, yes. Within the near future, vendors will provide the necessary tools to automate certain SOPs. For virtualization one of these tools will be Citrixs Workflow Studio. It will offer the capacity to automatically start-up new VMs when the load increases, eventhough this SOP will be automated it might be important to keep a copy of the SOP on paper.

What is the value of a SOP to a channel partner (VAR, reseller, integrator) or even an IT department with internal customers

Not only will SOPs offer, those servicing others, to increase their profitability of the system engineers executing the SOPs (locally at the customer or from remote), it also offers better ‘invoicing capacity’ (SOPs are ticketed, ticketing means timestamping, timestamping means invoicing). Furthermore tasks get documented, which offers the capacity for the SEs to jobrotate increase the satisfaction of the personnel.

On a commercial level it offers the possibility to increase credibility with the customer and it even opens doors when it comes to upsellin. (f.e. SOP for adding a new VM, results in the VM not being created as the hardware does not meet the prerequisites). 

Call to action

If you have any SOPs, which you wish to share with other virtualization professionals, feel free to forward the location where they can be found and we will make sure that they get the necessary visibility. We will publish a number of SOPs in the near future, in the mean time start SOPPING (not meant in literal way). 

Example set of SOPs

  • Build VM
  • Commission VM
  • Decommission VM
  • Server maintenance (multiple SOPs)
  • Incident respons (multiple SOPs)
  • Contact supplier / vendor for support
  • Add LUN
  • Remove LUN
  • Patch template
  • Create snapshot
  • Revert snapshot
  • Disk Add
  • Disk Expand
  • Disk Remove

CA enters Virtualization Management market October 7, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.
add a comment

today will announce a group of products aimed squarely at the new-world data center and its growing ranks of virtual machines.

With today’s announcement, CA debuts Data Center Automation Manager 11.2, plus nine tools aimed at infrastructure, application performance and service management, as well as information governance.

Like many products in its category, CA’s Data Center Automation Manager tool seeks to minimize the amount of time IT spends caring for virtual machines, while improving agility and efficiency. It includes elements such as a rules-based policy engine and the ability to analyze performance measures and configuration details from apps and systems, while integrating with other CA tools including CA AutoSys Workload Automation, CA NSM, CA Service Desk, and CA Wily Introscope. The new products will all be available within a few weeks.

Full release.

How to make a correct Server Virtualization Decision? October 7, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.
add a comment

Server Virtualization has already shown its value to IT departments and user, there is an enormous offer in the market from different vendors. How can you make the correct decision, perhaps the following checklist might help:

Feature set: decide which features you require (migration, load balancing, recovery, snapshot, patch management, …) use these features to compare different solutions from different vendors one to another.

Easa of use: how is the management done, how long does it take to implement, …

Virtual Infrastructure Management: what are the management requirements, how about adaptativce behaviour to business

Integration/Heterogeneity: different OS support, different storage support, hypervisors?, …

Price: make sure you compare apples-to-apples, make multiple analysis for 4 sockets, 8 sockets, …

Price

Storage Virtualization – a quick overview October 6, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Storage Virtualization & Storage.
Tags:
add a comment

Now that server virtualization, application virtualization and desktop virtualizaiton are becoming mainstream a new virtualization solution looms around the corner: storage virtualization The guyes over at computerworld.com took the time to work out an elarborate article on the subject divided into smaller pieces:

If you are looking for an extensive tutorial on storage virtualization visits the ‘Storage Networking Industry Association website for a complete manual.

Using ROI analysis to build a compelling business case for VDI October 6, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in desktop virtualization.
Tags: ,
add a comment

Raj mallempati (Group Product Manager, VMware) talks with Steve Kaplan (VP Data Center Virtualization Practice) of INX on ROI analysis to build your case for VDI. Listen here.

Marathon Technologies signs distribution agreement with Ingram October 6, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.
Tags:
add a comment

Marathon Technologies has signed a distribution agreement with (he single North-American Citrix distributor)  Ingram Micro. The agreement covers the everrun productline and is limited to North America. Full press release.

DataCore to LeftHand resellers …. hello October 6, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Storage Virtualization & Storage.
Tags: ,
add a comment

DataCore Software announced today its new “Step Up to DataCore” program for LeftHand Networks’ resellers. The program, which includes discounted software and extra margin rebates, is dedicated to helping LeftHand resellers become successful DataCore partners. DataCore believes the uncertainty surrounding LeftHand’s loss of independence is an opportune moment for LeftHand resellers to seriously consider stepping up to the better performance and scalability of the DataCore product line to differentiate their solution offerings from those of the herd. The company now stands in the spotlight as a leading, independent storage software vendor serving the virtualization market. 

More info.

NetApp releases “50% Virtualization Guarantee” programme October 6, 2008

Posted by Roel Gydé in Storage Virtualization & Storage.
Tags:
1 comment so far

The storage vendor NetApp just released its “50% Virtualization Guarantee” programme. The programme is focused on storage for virtualized environments and is based around 3 documents and the use of the following features: Thin provisioning, Deduplication, RAID-DP and NetApp Snapshot

If you implement the solution as they say and you don’t use 50% less storage, they will offer you the additional required storage for free. There is even a nice calcultator on the website that will help you with your capacity needs. For sure this is a nice offer, this offer is available till the end of March 2009.

To bad it is for ‘primary storage’ only, the customer must purchase at least 14 disks and a support contract from NetApp. Here is the catch … no more than 10% of the following will be covered under the program: images, graphics, XML data, database data, exchange data, encrypted data, scientific data. Furthermore the program seems to be only open to VMware environments.

More info can be found here.