Microsoft TechED 2008: Hyper-V versus ESX June 19, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: ESX, Hyper-V, Management, solution, XenServer
1 comment so far
For one or another bizar reason the comparisions Hyper-V vs. ESX went public. A nice article on this discussion was posted by Peter Bruzesse on inforworld. The article was completely non biased and it was kept to the facts. Unfortunately once again some MS-addicts and VMW-addicts managed to get into a competing conversation on which technology was the best.
Personally I can understand that you prefer one brand over another, but that you start comparing a brand on features, that is way beyond my understanding. It is not the brand that counts, it is a solution that counts. This virtualization solution should fit the current and future requirements of the business, must be easy to manage, … clearly this decission can not be taken on feature-level. Below is an overview of our short reply to all the posts that Peter got on his article:
As a channel manager for a distributor in Europe we often get confronted with channelplayers that do not see which solution/brand to propose. Comparing the products on feature-level is not the best way. It all depends if you require an engine or a car like Simon Crosby often states.
Seen the fact that VMware has been in this market much longer than other brands, it is normal that they are leader. When new technology comes out, it is normal that everybody gets on this wagon and chooses that brand as there is no alternative.
If a company needs to take a decision regarding a brand/solution, expressions like “we’ve swapped 7000 VMs from datacenter 1 to datacenter 2 over a super high speed link 100km away” are totally irrelevant.
Decisions for a solution or a brand should be based on the current and future requirements of the business, the TCO, ROI manageability, ecosystem of the solution, …
There are three major players running around in the ballpark right now: Citrix, Microsoft and VMware and others following . But in the long term it will not be the hypervisor that will be the winner, it will be the business that once again gets in the driverseat and IT needs to align to this driverseat.
VKernel releases Capacity Bottleneck Analyzer 1.2 for VMware June 19, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Capacity Bottleneck Analyzer, ESX, Management, VKernel
add a comment
Imagine being able to instantly identify capacity bottlenecks on hosts, clusters and resources pools. Capacity bottlenecks, when not resolved, cause performance problems or even downtime. VKernel´s Capacity Bottleneck Analyzer Virtual Appliance immediately builds a list of current RAM, CPU, storage and network bottlenecks in a VMware infrastructure. It also predicts future capacity bottlenecks and alerts you when trends exceed customizable thresholds.
Free trial here, at present is unclear if the solution will also be available for XenServer or Hyper-V
Virtual Service Oriented Grids June 18, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Grid, Intel, Management, SOA, virtualization
add a comment
Imagine if you take virtualization, combine it with SOA and add some grid computing … you get ‘virtual service oriented grids’.
With virtualization you can increase the load on your physical server, with SOA yoiu enable the system to be agile and align with the business. When adding grid computing you get the most flexible, adaptive datacenter that responds to the requirements from the business. That is what IT should be about, adapting IT to the business.
Intel will be publishing a book on how ‘Virtual Service Oriented Grids’ will be changing the enterprise. You can find an abstract here. A must read for late summer.
Virtualization and IT OPS … June 9, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Management, VMware
add a comment
Kevin Lees wrote an extensive article on the influence of virtualization on IT Operations and vice versa.
… Virtualization continues to be recognized as sufficiently mature for deployment in production environments. In fact, I would say it’s either rapidly approaching or has already arrived at the “knee in the curve.” The coming years will see an exponential increase in virtualized production environments as it passes this bend and begins its, what I believe will be, rapid climb up the steep part of the deployment curve.
What will influence how rapidly virtualization technologies are deployed in production? Certainly its increasing technical maturity will have a huge impact. For anyone who has attended VMworld or who takes regular notice of virtualization industry announcements, there should be little doubt that the advancements we see in virtualization’s core technology (for instance, hardware assisted virtualization) as well as in supporting solutions (like VMware’s Storage Motion, Stage Manager and Lifecycle Manager or Citrix’s XenCenter and XenMotion) will continue unabated. But, will the maturity of virtualization’s technologies and supporting solutions alone drive the steepness of the deployment curve? If not, what else might influence how rapidly virtualization is deployed in production environments? In my opinion, it will be IT Operations. This series of articles will look at virtualization’s impact on IT Operations. This first article discusses the advantages virtualization offers to IT Operations. The second article will address the IT Operations’ challenges presented by virtualization and the current state of available tools to address these challenges. The final article in the series will consider virtualization’s impact on IT Operations from an ITIL perspective. …
Integrien addresses virtualization complexity with “Integrien Alive” May 27, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Alive, Integrien, Management
add a comment
It’s no secret that the rapid adoption of data center virtualization, while providing the clear cost savings of server consolidation, creates a much more difficult environment for the management of performance and availability of virtualized applications. While other management vendors tout their ability to capture metrics from virtual environments, their tools still require massive amounts of manual effort to solve performance problems and simply cannot scale in a virtualized environment. Integrien is taking a new approach to virtualization management by automating much of this manual effort in today’s dynamic and complex virtualized environments.
