Virtualization & Cloud Computing Industry News [14.09.09] September 14, 2009
Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, File Virtualization, I/O Virtualization, Memory Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, datacenter, desktop virtualization.Tags: App-V, Citrix, DaaS, Data Recovery, Desktone, IBM, Marathon Technologies, MDOP, Microsoft, VDI, VMware, Wyse
add a comment
It has been a while that we have posted here … for wich we offer our humble excuses. We’ll do our best to not let you down the following weeks, months, …
- Microsoft will release MDOP 2009 R2 shortly after the release of Windows 7 on October 22nd, instead of Q1 2010 as previously expected [Full article]
- VMware released the 1.0.2 (Build 188925) version of their VMware Data Recovery solution [notes] and vCenter Lifecycle Manager solution version 1.0.2 [notes]
- BriadMadden TV: Dive into PC-over-IP, which will be released with View 4 [Full media]
- Parallels announced the addition of Microsoft Office Communications Server R2 to its Parallels Automation offering [Full article]
- Marathon Technologies names new CEO and President: Jim Welch [Full article]
- IBM plans to launch the Smart Business Desktop offering in October 2009 with a subscription model, the solution is based on collaboration between IBM, Citrix, Desktone, Wyse and VMware [more]
EVENTS:
- October 13th, 2009 – Online – “CitrixLive: Secrets, Lies and VDI” - free virtual event – [register]
Citrix asks “What is a Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA)?” April 2, 2009
Posted by Yves Peeters in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, datacenter.Tags: Citrix, Licensing, Microsoft, virtualization, XenApp
add a comment
Microsoft has the best definition as they have been in this business for years now. They define a SPLA in the following way, “A licensing program that enables service providers and ISVs with a hosted offering to license Microsoft products on a monthly basis to provide services and hosted applications to their end customers.”
Some qualifying questions for entry into a SPLA program might be the following:
1. Do you provide software services and hosted apps on a rental, subscription or services basis?
2. Are you a hosting provider, an ASP, a SI or an ISV that provides software as a service?
3. Is one of your primary objectives to avoid up-front license fees and minimum commitments?
4. Is your goal to maximize the number of end-user served from the same underlying software?
5. Will your customers accept not owning the software or having it located at their site?
If you can answer YES to most of these questions then most likely a SPLA program would fit your business model.
According to Microsoft there are many benefits to using a SPLA. Because the license is subscription based over time it will often cost more than a perpetual license for the same software. However, the benefits far outweigh the cost if the business model is structured correctly.
The following is a list of benefits Microsoft uses for their SPLA program:
• No Upfront Costs
• Most Current Product Versions – You have access to the most current versions of the products available in the program
• Pay Based On Usage – Monthly usage-based cost means you pay only for what was made available the previous month
• Worldwide Distribution – Use Microsoft licensed products to sell your services in any part of the world
Please take a look here and vote!
Virtualization & Cloud Industry News [03.02.09] February 3, 2009
Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, File Virtualization, I/O Virtualization, Memory Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, datacenter, desktop virtualization.Tags: Citrix, EMC, Gartner, Independence, Lanamark, Memory Virtualization Platform, Microsoft, mRemote, Netapp, Parallels, Remote Desktop, RNA networks, RNAmessenger, Solid State Disk, View Open Client, Visionapp, VMware, Xenocode
add a comment
It has been a while since we posted the last ‘virtualization & cloud industry news”, our excuses for this, here are the most important announcements:
Following project Independence of Citrix (a baremetal client hypervisor in collaboration with Intel), VMware released its open source VDI client: VMware View Open Client. VMware hopes to maximize its return by focussing thin client vendors, these thin clients will form an important number of all installed devices according to Gartner. So the battle moves from the server-side to the desktop. (more)
EMC and Microsoft extend their collaboration into 2011 (more)
Following the European Code of Conduct for Data Centers, the Green Grid initiative will be announcing on the 4th plans to develop a new metric for data center productivity and a data center 2.0 design guide.
RNA networks specializing in memory virtualization software (transforming server memory into a shared network resource) announced the launch of its Memory Virtualization Platform (MVP) and first product, RNAmessenger, based on the MVP (more)
The partnership between Xsigo and Dell will result in additional I/O ports on PowerEdge servers on the fly without the need for extra network interface cards, providing increased I/O virtualization. (more)
Parallels will preview its new hypervisor which was initailly scheduled for 2006 on its Summit 2009, furthermore its new orchestration product (Virtual Automation) will also be previewed.
Visionapp has released Remote Desktop 2009 with additional support for Citrix ICA, VNC, SSH, Telnet and HTTPS furthermore there are features of mRemote included in the new release (more)
Lanamark specializing in virtualization capacity planning and IT assessment software, the availability of Lanamark Suite 2009, including support for monitoring Citrix XenServer and VMware ESX, supplements server information with power consumption, form factor, age and warranty metrics, and simplifies capacity planning with significant user experience and reporting automation enhancements. (more)
XenoCode has released Virtual Application Studio 2009 building further in the application virtualization market (more)
Texas Memory Systems and NetApp partner on solid state disk
Another Microsoft Licensing Policy Update: What’s Good? What’s Left? January 23, 2009
Posted by Yves Peeters in Application virtualization, Server Virtualization, desktop virtualization.Tags: Hyper-V, Licensing, Microsoft, virtualization, VMware, XenServer
add a comment
Last Friday, Microsoft’s latest round of licensing changes were released to the public as two documents:
- “Licensing Windows Server 2008 to Run with Virtualization Technologies“
- “Licensing Microsoft Server Products in Virtual Environments“
There is definitely some good news here. CAL requirements for “indirect access to Windows 2008″ were lifted. So organizations will only need CALs for Windows guest OSs and the applications that run within them. The previous policy impacted customers running Microsoft’s Hyper-V hypervisor and did not affect licensing on any other hypervisor.
Is Offline VDI and the Client Hypervisor: Worth The Effort? January 22, 2009
Posted by Yves Peeters in Application virtualization, desktop virtualization.Tags: Citrix, Hyper-V, Microsoft, VDI, VMware, XenApp, XenDesktop
add a comment
Citrix has announced that they’ll be offering an alternative to traditional on-line VDI deployments (ala XenApp) in the form of a client hypervisor (Project Independence, posted yesterday). In essences, a client hypervisor allows a user to run a full-blown virtual machine on their desktop — basically a throw-back to running VMware Workstation/Player in the enterprise before we had all these fancy virtual platforms like Virtual Infrastructure and Hyper-V.
It allows users to work anywhere without concern about having an uplink. On planes, in coffee shops where there’s no Wifi or the connection is too small to reliably delivery a VDI experience. It also paves the way to true application virtualization, where the CPU-based hypervisor can be trimmed down to support running applications directly without the bloated guest operating system.
To learn more and to read the entire article at its source, please refer to the following page, Offline VDI and the Client Hypervisor: Worth The Effort?
Xen-based hypervisors push performance limits – Citrix XenServer 5.0 Top Finisher January 21, 2009
Posted by Yves Peeters in I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization.Tags: Citrix, ESX, Hyper-V, Microsoft, Novell XEN, Virtual Iron, virtualization, VMware, Xen, XenServer
add a comment
Tom Henderson and Brendan Allen of Network World Lab Alliance conducted an extensive performance testing of Citrix XenServer 5.0, Novell’s Xen 3.2 and Virtual Iron 4.4. Two other vendors — Sun and Red Hat — were invited to participate but because of varying timing problems, declined to participate.
The testing confirmed that open source Xen is a formidable challenger to the closed code VMware and Microsoft hypervisors. When the performance of business transactions running on top of the hypervisors was measured, Citrix’s XenServer 5.0 was the top finisher in nine out of 12 test runs.
Citrix VMs are tops in transaction processing, Novell’s in I/O speed.
Read the full article here.
Virtualization & Cloud Industry News [07.01.09] January 7, 2009
Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, File Virtualization, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, datacenter, desktop virtualization.Tags: VMware, Sun, Microsoft, Vizioncore, Igel, Amazon, cloud attached storage, View 3.0, LinMin, QLayer, Citrix Synergy, NASDAQ
add a comment
Registration for Citrix Synergy 2009 in Las Vegas has been opened. Synergy hosts this year Network World Live!, Virtualization Congress, Geek Speak Live!
Igel Technology is one of the first thin client vendors to obtain VMware View 3.0 certification approval for their thin clients.
LinMin introduces bare metal provisioning 5.3 with improved GUI and support for the latest Linux distris.
Sun buys QLayer, Qlayer will be part of the cloud computing unit within Sun. QLayer was one of the driving forces behind CloudCamp Brussels and generated a turnover of around 0,8 million EUR. The company specializes in development of virtual data center software.
VMware confirms that eight new ESX configurations have been approved by Microsoft for support under the Server Virtualization Validation Program (SVVP). (more)
Tod Nielsen has been hired by VMware, Tod comes from Borland, where he’s been CEO for the last three years. He will be the new VMware chief operating officer, a specially created job that reports to fellow Microsoft veteran, VMware CEO Paul Maritz.
Bob Muglia has been named president of the Server and Tools Business within the Redmon giant Microsoft, he served the same group previously as Vice-President.
Vizioncore announced that vRanger Pro 3.2.8, the latest version of its backup and restore solution, is the first product on the market today to provide full support for VMware ESXi 3.5 (more)
Intel is sued by Matthew Robert Young for $5 billion from prison. Mr. Young insists that the chip maker has based its core 2 Duo chip and its virtualization technology are based on trade secrets … (more)
Parallels updates its Mac desktop virtualization software to improve DirectX support and adds experimental support for upcoming Microsoft and Apple operating systems (more)
NASDAQ uses Amazon for cloud storage (more)
Microsoft aims at VMware with Citrix Management Tools [Project: Encore] December 22, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Encore, Hyper-V, Microsoft, Vmotion, XenServer
add a comment
At present Microsoft is not offering ‘live migration’, as of the first quarter of 2009, it will … thanks to Citrix. This will catapult Hyper-V to the same leagues as XenServer and VMware vSphere.
What will happen: the Citrix XenServers management tools will also work with Hyper-V according to Lou Shipley (GM and Group VP of Citrix Management Group). The product is dubbed ‘Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V’, it will likely include a number of xEnServer management features for Hyper-V such as live migration, multiserver management and creation of resource pools, which are standard features of XenServer Enterprise.
Especially the live migration features is much welcomed in Redmond as it has been put on the Hyper-V roadmap for 2010 with 2008 R2.
At the time of writting of this article, no one was available for comment at Citrix or Microsoft. One thing for sure, if the customer has Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V it will clearly a product with which you will be able to manage Hyper-V and XenServer systems. Story to be continued ….
Virtualization Industry News [22.12.08] December 22, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, DPM, IIHT, Insystek, Microsoft
add a comment
Insystek announced that it is making publicly available a beta program for its new Virtualize IT™ for VMWare management and reporting tools. With Insystek Virtualize IT™ technology, customers will be able to discover and map virtual environments, create virtual machines, track and manage physical and virtual relationships and automate the lifecycle of a large number of virtual servers and desktops.
Citrix Systems has announced its tie-up with Indian Institute of Hardware Technology (IIHT) to launch and deliver the Citrix training programme
Microsoft DPM will protect Hyper-V with SP1
Virtualization Industry News [01.12.08] December 2, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Application virtualization, Cloud Computing, Data Center Management, File Virtualization, I/O Virtualization, Server Virtualization, Storage Virtualization & Storage, desktop virtualization.Tags: Datacore, DynamicOPS, Fedora, Microsoft, Pillar Data Systems, Ulteo, VDIworks, VDIworks2Go
add a comment
Product news:
- Ulteo released its first Open Virtual Desktop (more)
- Fedora 10 has been released and it contains improved virtualization features. (more)
- Microsoft has released the offline virtual machine servicing tool 2.0 (download)
- DataCore signs a distribution agreement with Promark Technology for distribution in the US.
- Pillar Data Systems announces application aware profiles compatible with Citrix XenServer
- VDIworks offers VDIs to mobile workforce through VDIworks2Go (VDIs in offline mode)
HR news:
- Dan Mitchell, former Technical Director of Dunes left VMware to join the startup DynamicOp
Microsoft to the cloud … Azure November 3, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Cloud Computing.Tags: Azure, cloud, Microsoft
add a comment
During PCD2008, Ray Ozzie released a new Microsoft solution for the cloud, based on current Windows technology. The solution is called ‘Azure’, but it will not be available for an onsite customer install. It will only be available from Microsoft datacenters. Azure is powerd by a highly scalable hypervisor (Hyper-V 2.0?). All components of the cloud manager are redundant.
As it will not be available for onsite install at a customer, it seems to be that Microsoft will be offering a solution for those that wish to move to the cloud or those that wish to use the cloud as a burst-solution.
The ‘ready for production year’ will probably be 2010.
Addition: Srivistava: No, we have our own hypervisor, which we have designed specifically for the design point. We just call it Windows Azure hypervisor, but a lot of the advancements we are making are moving into Hyper-V, [so] the same thing will be available to the on-premises customer. The virtualization support that you get in hardware like NPT and EPT, the nested page tables that are there. We are taking a lot of advantage of that, so that’s what [Microsoft engineer] Dave Cutler has done in really optimizing the thing out, so the overhead of the hypervisor is extremely low. And when the hypervisor overhead is low, then we can get maximum utilization by dividing the machine. (more here)
Cloud Computing … what to cloud and what not to cloud and with whom? … Cloud Computing Incidents Database October 12, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Cloud Computing.Tags: CCI, CCID, Citrix, cloud, Microsoft, VMware
add a comment
Both VMware, Citrix and Microsoft have announced their cloud-initiatives. The one is a little bit ahead in development then the other, but in general none of the three have a cloud-initiative that is “ready to manufacture”.
In the case that the cloud is “ready-to-manufacture”, the next step is analyzing which application can be moved into the cloud and who will be your cloud-provider. When looking at the type of applications you will be “clouding”, it is important to verify the “value” of the application to the business.
First of all you are moving an application (which requires data) to the internet / cloud. So there are possible security risks. The Cloud Computing Incidents Database (CCID) tracks all events that impact cloud computing providers. Do not forget that the CCID is an open-community (only founded earlier this year.), so it relies on people logging the events, as you can espect major cloud-providers are not logging their events.
If you look at the stats for Q3/08 you get 3 critical events, 3 high severity events and 3 others, the incidents range from disaster recovery, design faults, … into session hijacking, user impersonation, … Even one resulted in all data being lost due to closure of the service (The Linkup).
It must be said, whatever cloud initiative you will be implementing keep a very close eye on the financial stability of your provider, the relationship with your provider and the security your provider is offering you.
A vendor that is specializing in offering cloud solutions to cloud providers must be aware of the security risks and react accordingly in order to prevent security breaches which might result in data theft, resulting in lost profitability of the customer.
Looking at the earlier mentioned vendors, we see that VMware is moving with small steps ahead when it comes to providing security solutions for their cloud initiative and it must be said that their solution will be probably the latest on the market.
Addition 13.10.2008 – If the information on the web is correct, it seems to be that VMware will indeed takeover BlueLane Technologies, a specialist in protecting both physical and virtual servers. Yet it gets integrated on the server itself and is in that way not the security solution when it comes to protecting the data center or the cloud center.
Microsoft has already a number of security solutions onboard, but do their security features meet the grade? We will have to wait for the next big event from Microsoft, probably more will be announced then.
Citrix is probably in this field, the one that is leading the pack. Their Netscaler can be equipped with layer 7 application firewalling, the access to the cloud can be encrypted with SSL-VPN solutions and their end-to-end virtualization solution can be integrated with the market leaders on 2-factor-authentication such as Vasco.
Another question that comes to mind is the type of cloud provider. Do endusers need to go ahead with big cloud providers such as Amazon.com, Google, Flexiscale, …. or can they rely on their value added reseller. Seen the fact that VAR has been implementing the IT infrastructure for the enduser and supporting its infrastructure, he is probably the best positioned to offer cloud services. Afterall it is just moving the infrastructure to another virtual location (sort of speak).
On the other hand the value added reseller might not have structure to setup big clouds. This might lead to clouds being set up by different value added resellers across the world, resulting in a gigantic cloud with follow-the-sun support.
One thing is for sure, the cloud computing initiative has just been founded, vendors are still working on their final offerings, the market is preparing itself, VARs & integrators need to prepare business cases, … we are not there yet ! However, we might be there in a very short time ! Prepare !
Memory overcommit … October 10, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.Tags: Citrix, memory overcommit, Microsoft, VMware
add a comment
There has been a lot written about ‘memory overcommit’ and now that Microsoft stands directly against VMware the debat is open again.
In general overcommit gives the ability to give a VM more memory than there physically is. One vendor is very clear about this at present, Citrix clearly gives the signal no overcommit. Simon Crosby has even a standard response to overcommiting memory.
“If you buy a ticket for flying from Brussels to New York, you intend to fly, there is a clear reason why you purchase a ticket. Airline companies however are famous for overbooking flights. You arrive (of course way to late at the airport, due to a meeting that took more time than foreseen), and you get the message, sorry you will have to take the next flight there are no seats left. As compensation we will over you diner here in the Airport.
Overcommiting memory in a data center has the same effect, VMs believe they have 128GB RAM each, altough there is only 64GB physical RAM to be divided over the different VMs. What happens when a VM really needs the 128GB of RAM he thinks he has, but has not? A major failur will occur and this will result in motioning VMs to other machines, loss of productivity, reduced profitability of the company, …
Altough you get a diner offered by the airline in compensation when a flight is overbooked, what is the compensation for the VM that gets into trouble due to overcommitting, what is the compensation for the business losing money as its VMs are not running ?
Now that Microsoft and VMware get into a personal competition it is very interesting to see what both have to say on overcommitting memory.
VMware is clear about it, they are the only one at present to offer this feature. But there is a clear remark on overcommitting by VMware. there need to be three ingredients (as Alberto Farronato calls it) active and well-configured: transparent memory paging, balloon driver, optimized algorithms in the hypervisor kernel.
Microsoft has always said they would not include overcommit in Hyper-V (to our knowledge it is not included in the current verison). Yet Alberto Farronato (VMW) aims at Microsoft, he writes in his post, … Bob Muglia, Microsoft VP, confirmed the usefulness of memory overcommit, …, he refers to an interview between Bob Muglia and Steven Bink during the Windows server 2008 launch in LA. In the article by Steven Bink, Mr. Muglia says the following:
We talked about Vmware ESX and its features like shared memory between VMs, “we definitely need to put that in our product” later he said it will be in the next release. Like hot add memory, disk and nic’s will be and Live migration of course, which didn’t make it in this release.
To my knowledge there is a great difference between shared memory and memory overcommit. This does not mean that Microsoft will be integration ‘memory overcommit’. Overcommitting is something different than sharing.
It must be said, VMware is doing its best to proof that overcommitting is a good think, they performed an online research amongst 110 VMware customers. Apparently 57% is using overcommit, that leaves 43% that is not using overcommit. Of those 57% overcommitting, there are 11% only using it within development-environments. So from the 110 respondents that means that 55 companies are not using overcommitt … that is 50%.
Overcommitting is for sure a hot topic, with clearly a team in favour and a team against. Perhaps this is the moment that we have to start looking at memory-virtualization and offering memory cross-platform to VMs.
Anyhow, if you buy a planeticket to go on honeymoon, you hope that the flight is not overbooked. Otherwise, you will be like friends of mine, postponing their honeymoon for 2 days. Not a happy tought.
Microsoft will launch “Windows Cloud OS” October 6, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Cloud Computing.Tags: cloud, Microsoft
add a comment
Stevel Ballmen on October 1st:
“We need a new operating system designed for the cloud and we will introduce one in about four weeks,” Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said yesterday in London. “We’ll even have a name to give you by then. But let’s just call it for the purposes of today ‘Windows Cloud.’ Just like Windows Server looked a lot like Windows but with new properties, new characteristics and new features, so will Windows Cloud look a lot like Windows Server.’”More to be announced during the Professional Developers Conference of Microsoft later this month.
Microsoft Hyper-V final version available for download October 6, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Server Virtualization.Tags: Hyper-V, Microsoft
add a comment
Microsoft announced the final release and availability of Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008, a new bare metal hypervisor-based server virtualization product. Available as a no-cost Web download at http://www.microsoft.com/Hyper-VServer
Microsoft Backtracks on Live Migration, Again September 14, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Hyper-V, live migration, Microsoft
add a comment
For the second time, Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) has put off including live migration features in its virtualization technology.
Live migration capabilities enable users to move a virtual machine (VM) either manually or automatically from one physical server, cluster or processor to another, instantaneously, while the VM’s still running. This can help IT prevent overloading of the infrastructure’s physical computing resources.
Microsoft has twice promised that live migration would make its way into its own virtualization products, which would better enable them to compete with rival offerings from vendors like VMware and Citrix, both of which offer the feature.
Company spokespeople did not say what had caused the latest delay.
Full article on InternetNews
Market Talk: Will Microsoft buy Citrix – [Part 2] September 12, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Microsoft
add a comment
John C Dvorak talks about a possible take-over bit by Microsoft on Citrix in his Tech 5 podcast. Douglas Brown (DABCC) commented on this podcast with a number of reason why it might be the case:
- Citrix got rid of all American distributors except Ingram Micro …
- Citrix stopped spending money on advertising …
- Citrix closed all their open job recs. …
- Apparently Citrix laid 20-30 people off in the States (all Business Relationship jobs …)
Apparently some industry experts in the States believe that there might be an announcement on September 15th or even today.
One thing is for sure, if somebody is looking to buy Citrix, the buyer will have to take into account the good relationship and ongoing agreement between Microsoft and Citrix.
!!! Addition 9/13/2008 – Based on the information we got from Citrix employees,people close to Citrix as well as analysts, it is unlikely that there will be an announcement of this kind the following days. Maybe the rumor just popped up as it is VMworld 2008 next week. Who knows
Sychron announces support for Microsoft Hyper-V September 11, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Hyper-V, Microsoft, Sychron
add a comment
Sychron, the virtual workspace management company, today announced support for Microsoft Hyper-V™, a hypervisor-based technology that is a key feature of Windows Server 2008. Sychron’s support means that customers using HyperV environments can now deliver and manage fast and cost-effective virtual desktops using Sychron’s OnDemand Desktop, the company’s flagship virtual desktop management solution. This announcement underscores Sychron’s commitment to remain agnostic to the hypervisor layer while providing a feature-rich management environment for virtual desktops of all types.
Full release here
KVM vs. Xen vs. VMware. Is it a Hypervisor War? September 11, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, KVM, Microsoft, Novell, Oracle, VMware, Xen
add a comment
No Virtualizing Without A License — Disaster Recovery September 11, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Licensing, Microsoft, VMware
add a comment
Mike Healey posted an article on licensing in a virtualized environment.
Licensing rules vary by vendor, so it’s a good idea to compile a full software list and review it with licensing vendors to be sure you’re in compliance.
Full article here
Market Talk: Will Microsoft Buy Citrix? September 10, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Microsoft, VMware
add a comment
According to Microsoft insiders, Forbes speculates that Microsoft might eventually buy Citrix, a market cap of $6.4 billion
The article
Why Microsoft Virtualization is Different (and possibly better) by IRG September 9, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, EMC, HP, IBM, Microsoft, Parallels, Virtual Iron, VMware
add a comment
Internet Research Group (IRG) today announced the release of its latest report on technology infrastructure, “Why Microsoft Virtualization is Different (and possibly better).”
With this summer’s launch of Hyper-V, Microsoft began shipping its long awaited entry into the server virtualization market in competition with VMware’s ESX, the market leader. This new research report compares Microsoft’s quite distinct virtualization strategy to that of VMware as the two companies battle to win enterprise customers.
“As the old saying goes, if all you have is a hammer then everything is a nail,” noted Peter Christy, co-founder of IRG. “VMware has built a very successful business around the hypervisor and virtual machine, and not surprisingly expresses its strategy that way. Microsoft has a much broader set of products, and sees virtualization just as one element in their effort to improve IT effectiveness. Is this all just marketing spin or is there real substance here?”
This report compares the business value focus of Microsoft and VMware as they continue to develop market opportunities for their virtualization products.
Vendors directly impacted by Microsoft’s virtualization market entry include: Citrix, HP, IBM, EMC, Parallels, Virtual Iron and VMware. One step removed most IT participants are impacted by virtualization and this business competition.
More information here
Microsoft virtualization: no more licensing concessions September 8, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Licensing, Microsoft
add a comment
As Microsoft formally launches its virtualization plans, SVP Bob Muglia sits down with CIO.com’s Kevin Fogarty to talk about licensing gripes from customers and winning the battle with VMware. Microsoft’s not looking to make VMs more mobile, he says. Full article here.
Microsoft shores up its virtualized desktop story September 8, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: App-V, AssetMetrix, DesktopStandard, Kidaro, MDOP, Microsoft, Softricity, Winternals Software
add a comment
The company said development on the newly named App-V 4.5 has been completed and that it will be included in the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP) 2008 R2 that is set for release in a few weeks.
MDOP includes App-V; Enterprise Desktop Virtualization for managing and deploying virtual PCs; Asset Inventory Service, an inventory scanning tool; System Center Desktop Error Monitoring; Advanced Group Policy Management for change management via group policy objects; and the Diagnostics and Recovery Toolset, which helps in recovering a crashed PC.
MDOP is comprised of software from Microsoft’s purchases of Softricity, Kidaro, AssetMetrix, Winternals Software and DesktopStandard.
App-V 4.5 also introduces Dynamic Suite Composition (DSC), which lets virtualized applications share middleware resources such as a database.
Furthermore changes have been made to the licensing model
More information can be found on the official MDOP-blog.
Gartner reports increased competition in Virtualization June 18, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Citrix, Gartner, Microsoft, Oracle, research, Sun, VMware
add a comment
Gartner continues to advise to implement solution with rapid ROI and fall-back plans. The Gartner view on Microsoft, Citrix, VMware, Oracle and Sun here.
Can Microsoft Pull Virtualization, SOA, Management, and SaaS Together? June 18, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Microsoft, SaaS, SOA, virtualization
add a comment
Just stumbled on a nice article by Judith Hurwitz about Microsoft. As an analyst she has had the chance to get a good view on the Microsoft tools division, based on the current technology trends she has set out the five focal points for Microsoft according to her.
… Windows on SUSE-XEN now supported by Microsoft June 11, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Hyper-V, Microsoft, Suse Xen
add a comment
Following our post on windows virtualization Validation Program post, it is now officially confirmed you can run Windows on a SUSE-XEN. currently the support from Microsoft only comes for Windows Server 2003 en 2008. Other platforms that will be supported are Citrix XenServer, Sun, …
Virtual Iron joins Microsoft Server Virtualization Validation Program June 10, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Microsoft, Virtual Iron
add a comment
Virtual Iron announced plans to validate its platform with the Microsoft Server Virtualization Validation Program. As part of this program, which became operational today, Virtual Iron will test and validate the Virtual Iron platform running Windows Server 2008 operating system. Once the platform is validated, Microsoft will offer cooperative support to Virtual Iron customers running the validated configuration of Microsoft Windows Server-based guest operating systems in Virtual Iron virtual environments. As a result, mutual customers will receive improved support hand-offs between the two companies and greater access to Microsoft’s worldwide support capabilities.
Full article here.
Lost in Microsoft licensing for virtualized environments with W2K8 June 10, 2008
Posted by Roel Gydé in Uncategorized.Tags: Licensing, Microsoft
add a comment
Let us be honest licensing is one the most complex things in virtualization. You have vendors that go onto concurrent-use, you have vendors that go to named-use and then … you have Microsoft.
First things first: if you have W2K8 STD you have the right to implement one virtual machine. If you have W2K8 ENT you have the right to implement four virtual machines and if you run the W2K8 DATAC edition make as much VMs as you wish. Now where is the balance point between enterprise and datacenter: 10 to 20 virtual machines per physical server.
If you look to VDI environments, make sure you SA is OK on your Microsoft licenses as this has a major influence on your licensing cost for VDI licenses !
More advice/tips can be found here.
